UPDATE: The open beta began just a little while ago and it's extremely hard to find a match. The game somehow is running worse than the stress test beta I played a couple weeks ago and it also looks the same. Luckily there is one new map with the open beta. It's fairly big and probably my favorite mission of the three available. It involves your squad infiltrating an enemy base then following two transport vehicles to an evac spot. It has the most variety in gameplay from stealthily(or gun ho) attacking the K.P.A. base to playing defense while moving through a crumbling city. One thing I have to say is that the atmosphere in this new map is great and you feel in this world. That would have to be the best takeaway from this beta. I'm still looking forward to the assumed more fleshed out and beautiful looking campaign. ORIGINAL REVIEW: Guerrilla warfare is the name of the game here in the multiplayer cooperative beta for the long awaited sequel to Homefront. The beta brings two co-op missions available to play with three of your friends on three different difficulties. While I've only played on easy mode, I must say it is very challenging. I could only imagine what hard is like, but for the sake of playing through each mission, I played on easy. First up is graphics and performance. The beta doesn't look all that impressive, nor does it run well. But it is a beta, specifically a stress test. The actual beta doesn't start for another two weeks. I'm sure the technical issues will be fixed by the actual release date. The graphics here though aren't really jaw dropping. Things seems really washed out and textures don't add any depth to what's in the world. Character models also look a bit out dated. Now I definitely think this won't be representative of the single player graphics, which actually look very good. There are two missions that are playable in the stress test, I don't know if more will be added for the full beta or any other modes. I'm hoping for a full fledged competitive multiplayer like the first game had, but I won't hold my breathe. One mission sees you and your buddies going to check out what a K.P.A. Militia is up to near your hideout, then things get a bit sticky. You retreat back to multiple standoff points to give friendly A.I. a chance to escape and plant bombs on the hideout to destroy any information that could be useful to the enemy. This mission was pretty challenging at first and actually took teamwork, I died multiple times on this mission. The second mission sees your squad going on the offensive and charging in on a full fledge assault. Your goal is to hack certain things throughout a fairly large map, much more open than the first. There is even a vehicle segment that changes up the gameplay. Overall these missions were fun to play through and see to the end. But I honestly couldn't tell you if I want to go and replay them. I want to try them out on hard and unlock a few more weapons and attachments, but there's not enough in this stress test build that makes me want to spend time with it. I put in two hours with the two mission and am ready to move on. There are mini objective you can try to complete that are shown in the loading screens where you can earn more XP, but your team must be compliant. Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/9304218

As someone who has dabbled in the Halo franchise but never actually got into the games, I can say Halo 5: Guardians is a great game. It's campaign is thoroughly enjoyable and it has one of the best multiplayer experiences I've ever played. 343 has definitely delivered an exceptional first person shooter and a solid entry into the Halo franchise. In the midst of a super crowded holiday season, Halo 5 is a clear stand out from Microsoft and shouldn't be missed. Halo 5's campaign is a 15 mission story that takes you to many different locations and offers some good looking cut scenes. Unfortunately though the actual story is a hit or miss. Some missions feel like they have purpose and add to the story, while others simply don't. I feel like 343 could have told a very personal story through the manhunt between Locke and Master Chief, but they severely missed that opportunity. The story then becomes something much to hard to follow than it needs to be. Something dealing with Guardians and Cortona. I honestly couldn't tell you and I was already at a disadvantage with the story not having played the previous titles in full. I can say my enjoyment of the campaign wasn't hindered by the mediocre story, but it sure would have made it better. The best part about Halo 5's campaign is playing it. We get a wide variety of maps and levels. Every mission felt new and refreshing. Areas in the game were pretty big and allowed for some huge fights. I personally liked how they handled vehicles in the game. Some missions had them and some didn't, but it all felt intentional. They really nailed the gameplay. You also use a variety of guns, which also makes the play through more enjoyable. But overall Halo 5's campaign isn't anything to marvel over and is quite normal. Where Halo 5: Guardians does deliver, is in it's multiplayer. Arena boasts a unique set of playlist and a wide variety of maps that are sure to keep you entertained for months. The arena type of matches are something I never experience before now and I must say it's very refreshing. There are no loadouts or customization, instead you focus on core skill and your ability to perform well. I like that there are power weapons on maps that teams can fight for, but they never give a team a huge advantage. Matches play very quickly, especially with the new movement improvements to the franchise. Halo 5 definitely has the best core multiplayer experience I have played this year. Halo 5 also introduces a warzone multiplayer game mode. It's very reminiscent of Titanfall and I didn't really enjoy it all that much. There's 12 versus 12, friendly and enemy AI, events, and objectives. Sadly it never feels good or fun to play. Requisition cards are earned by just playing any type of multiplayer and can be used to equip certain weapons or spawn vehicles. While it certainly adds more variety to the game mode, it doesn't save it from feeling very lousy. I'll stick with arena. Overall Halo 5: Guardians is a fun game and walks the line of being truly great. Unfortunately the game features a very short and mundane campaign and a failed new multiplayer gamemode that has been very hyped up. But arena is an absolute blast and very addicting, it should please any competitive shooter fan.

India is one of the world’s greatest emerging powers today. Its economy is growing rapidly and its military is one of the largest in the world, with over a million soldiers. India sees its nuclear weapons capacity to be an integral part of its vision as a great power, and its nuclear program is important for both its prestige and security doctrine.Yet, India’s nuclear weapons program has not been free of controversy and criticism. India is not a signatory to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT), and is not one of the five nuclear weapons powers the treaty recognizes. India’s nuclear tests in 1974 and 1998 led to criticism and even sanctions. Since then however, sanctions have largely been lifted and the United States had quietly accepted India’s possession of nuclear weapons so long as India does not carry out further nuclear tests, though officially, the United States has not recognized India as a nuclear weapons state. This has also led to many claims of double standards on the part of the United States for making exceptions for India—including getting the Nuclear Suppliers Group to agree to a waiver on export restrictions of nuclear materials for India—that have been granted to no other countries. This demonstrates the strategic importance of India for the West and the general global perception of its trustworthiness and stability. Here are five things you need to know about India’s interesting nuclear program. (Recommended: 5 Indian Weapons of War Pakistan Should Fear) Why did India build Nukes? Indian nationalist leaders speculated about the possibility of acquiring nuclear weapons even before its independence. India’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru justified this by arguing: “As long as the world is constituted as it is, every country will have to devise and use the latest devices for its protection. I have no doubt India will develop her scientific researches and I hope Indian scientists will use the atomic force for constructive purposes. But if India is threatened, she will inevitably try to defend herself by all means at her disposal.” The main impetus for India going nuclear, however, was China, which tested a nuclear weapon in 1964. Two years prior, China defeated India in a short but decisive border conflict and relations between the two countries were subsequently tense. Taken together, Indian leaders felt that India needed nuclear weapons to counter China’s conventional superiority and defend Indian territory, some of which China was perceived to have occupied.

After a couple delays and a few years since it's announcement, The Division is finally here. I was never necessarily looking forward to this game, but boy am I glad I picked up Ubisoft's new game up. It's a third person open world shooter with fairly deep role playing elements, along with seeds of an MMO. There's a lot to take in here and while I'm not going to be going every intricate detail in this review, I do want to talk about what makes this game work and things that hold it back. The biggest take away you should get from this review is that the game is fun. Videos online don't do it justice, you have to at least try this game out if you're on the fence. Actually playing the game was a completely different experience than watching a video. Get it on Gamefly, Redbox, a friend, or just buy it; it's worth the price of admission. The mission and side mission structure have enough variety to keep stringing you along, that mixed with compelling semi-stat based cover based shooting calls for a fun time. I have put in about thirty hours with The Division and have completed all the main missions (some more than once) and am now working on side missions to get me to the "End Game" or level thirty. Missions have just enough backstory and narrative to feel somewhat relevant, but at the end of the day you won't really care or know what's going on. It's just not that interesting. Luckily for Ubisoft, the overall premise of the game should have loads of potential to tell some fantastic stories through DLC or future sequels. Side missions are all variants of each other that get pretty old after a while if you do many in a row. Sadly that's where I'm at. I completed all the main missions, the latter of those missions were with higher rank players that helped pull me through the missions, which were above my rank. This will segway to the co-op gameplay, it's a blast if you're playing with three other friends at the same rank as you. Yes, the same rank as you. If you are rank 13 with three friends that are rank 20, the game will cater to their level and leave you in the dust. You will do limited damage to enemies and usual get one shot killed. It's not really fun if you're in this position, but sometimes it could be necessary if you want to complete a high ranked mission. At least you can match make each mission to get lobbied up with same rank players. This is true for every aspect of the game. Gunplay is pretty exciting. Each class of weapons feels very different from one another, but most of the guns in those classes can feel similar. Though each gun has different pros and cons like recoil or accuracy. You can attach mods to your guns to help with different stats. There's enough depth in the gun managing to make you care, which is great in a game like this. You also have many types of grenades and bullet types. Cover combat is the core of this game and it works great, full with flanking opportunities and suppression options. Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/9357258

After a couple delays and a few years since it's announcement, The Division is finally here. I was never necessarily looking forward to this game, but boy am I glad I picked up Ubisoft's new game up. It's a third person open world shooter with fairly deep role playing elements, along with seeds of an MMO. There's a lot to take in here and while I'm not going to be going every intricate detail in this review, I do want to talk about what makes this game work and things that hold it back. The biggest take away you should get from this review is that the game is fun. Videos online don't do it justice, you have to at least try this game out if you're on the fence. Actually playing the game was a completely different experience than watching a video. Get it on Gamefly, Redbox, a friend, or just buy it; it's worth the price of admission. The mission and side mission structure have enough variety to keep stringing you along, that mixed with compelling semi-stat based cover based shooting calls for a fun time. I have put in about thirty hours with The Division and have completed all the main missions (some more than once) and am now working on side missions to get me to the "End Game" or level thirty. Missions have just enough backstory and narrative to feel somewhat relevant, but at the end of the day you won't really care or know what's going on. It's just not that interesting. Luckily for Ubisoft, the overall premise of the game should have loads of potential to tell some fantastic stories through DLC or future sequels. Side missions are all variants of each other that get pretty old after a while if you do many in a row. Sadly that's where I'm at. I completed all the main missions, the latter of those missions were with higher rank players that helped pull me through the missions, which were above my rank. This will segway to the co-op gameplay, it's a blast if you're playing with three other friends at the same rank as you. Yes, the same rank as you. If you are rank 13 with three friends that are rank 20, the game will cater to their level and leave you in the dust. You will do limited damage to enemies and usual get one shot killed. It's not really fun if you're in this position, but sometimes it could be necessary if you want to complete a high ranked mission. At least you can match make each mission to get lobbied up with same rank players. This is true for every aspect of the game. Gunplay is pretty exciting. Each class of weapons feels very different from one another, but most of the guns in those classes can feel similar. Though each gun has different pros and cons like recoil or accuracy. You can attach mods to your guns to help with different stats. There's enough depth in the gun managing to make you care, which is great in a game like this. You also have many types of grenades and bullet types. Cover combat is the core of this game and it works great, full with flanking opportunities and suppression options. Your character also has a plethora of skill bases options. You have perks that are automatically put into play once unlocked. Talents can be assigned to one of four slots that are unlocked through rank. Then you have your skills which directly affect gameplay. They are assigned to your bumper buttons with a third skill activated by holding both together. These can be radar's, shields, health and ammo packs, along with a bunch of others. Your character can be tailored to one of three different paths that all feel unique in their own way. Loot is at the forefront in The Division and you get much of it. It has that addictiveness that it should to keep you playing for next best thing and this system works much better than Destiny's, which was to random. You will most likely get some type of gear that will be better that what you have every single time you go out into the world. You can also buy, create, and store weapons and gear at safe houses or your base of operations, which act as hubs for every player. Speaking of the world, it's a beautifully realized New York city that feels planted in reality. Ubisoft did a fantastic job with their direction of the city, characters, and designs. Some people are praising the graphics, while they are good, they aren't all that groundbreaking. Ubisoft implements a cool lighting system that makes the look of the game though. Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/9357258

With the increasing use of advanced technology in healthcare setups, many innovations have hit the market, the most convenient of which are mobile phone apps for doctors. Mobile apps have become the most common communication modality between doctors and their patients. In the recent years, there has been a massive shift of patients from doctors' websites to doctors' apps for the purpose of availing medical care. This shift can be attributed to several reasons. • Doctors' Apps Offer Ease of Communication Mobile apps for doctors are like virtual clinics where patients can get in direct contact with the doctor. Websites' "Contact us" pages usually contain phone numbers and emails, a process which can take days for the patients to communicate with the doctor. The remote chat, call and video consultation facilities ensure that patients get in touch with the doctor immediately for prompt medical advice. • Offline communication Mobile apps for doctors are not dependent on internet connection to work. This is in stark contrast to the websites that require a secure internet connection. Mobile apps give the patients the feasibility to reach expert doctors who are the leading names in practice, even if they are located in another city. Remote communication, even offline, is one of the biggest perks of using m-clinic apps for doctors. • Speedy contact Mobile apps for doctors run faster than the websites. It's easy to understand this concept. The apps run directly on your phone whereas the websites run within the browser installed on your phone. The extra layer causes the running of websites to slow down. With no such hindrance faced by mobile apps, speedy functionality and prompt medical advice are guaranteed to the patients, which is why they prefer using mobile apps to websites. Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/9382409

The reasons to women developing gynecologic cancer are many. The cancer is caused primarily due to the damage caused to certain genes resulting in the growth and spread of cells in an uncontrollable manner. The damage to the cells may be caused due to smoking, with age, due to environmental issues or even due to inheritance. The female reproductive organs such as cervix, ovaries, fallopian tubes, vagina and vulva are the source from which the cells grow abnormally. The different types of gynecological cancers are cancer of the cervix, ovarian cancer, vaginal cancer, cancer of the vulva, uterine cancer and very rarely you also get to hear of cancer of the fallopian tube. The narrow end of the uterus is where cervical cancer usually starts. This area connects to the top of the vagina. Women in their 30's are found to be more prone to this type of cancer and is found to be spread by the Human Papillomavirus. The survival rate of people with this type is very high because when detected early it is treatable. Ovaries are present on either side of the uterus and are found to cause the maximum number of deaths due to cancer of the female reproductive system. If diagnosed during the early stages, the treatment can surely help. The organ that homes the baby is called the uterus. Cancer that happens in the uterus is uterine cancer. It is shaped in the form of a pear and found in the pelvis. All women are risk bearers but the risk multiplies with age. Vaginal cancer happens in the vagina which is a tube kind of structure which is present just below the uterus and runs outside the body. It is one of the rarest forms of cancer of the female reproductive organs. The cancer happening in the vulva is cancer of the vulva. The vulva is the outer portion of female genitalia. It is also one of the rare types of cancer. Fallopian tubes are organs that connect the ovaries to the uterus. Cancer of these tubes is very rare but not unheard of. The different types of cancer of the female reproductive organs have different symptoms and they all come with different risk factors. They also have separate preventive measures. Frequent screening helps in early diagnosis which in turn leads to treatment. This early diagnosis and treatment can save one from the fatal consequences of cancer. Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/9222968